www.MintDepot.com

Leading Business,
News and information


Part of the Identityscape.com network...

getxfactor.com jmoodmusic.com smartbusinesschoices.com mintdepot.com lowfaresalways.com evangelicalview.com shoppingpodder.com soproudlywehail.com webnews.ws currenthumor.com

 

 

Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he was
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
   MintDepot.com - the Best of UseNet Hobby Postings! Forum Index -> Pets - Cats  
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nomen Nescio
Guest






PostPosted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:20 pm    Post subject: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he was Reply with quote

There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
Back to top
Globalist
Guest






PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:08 am    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

On Oct 30, 4:20 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
Quote:
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.

Oh this changes everything. Thanks for letting us know about "this
lie"....Of course Bush's lie, supported by McCain, murdered several
thousand innocent people, plus 4,000+ GIs, who died for that same
lie.
Back to top
Diana
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:45 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

In article <3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

Quote:
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.

Posted to a cat group? Well, you're certainly being catty.

Ever heard that the Harvard Law Review is headed up by the President of
the Law Review? This was Obama's role (as if being on the Board of
Editors would not be a sufficient distinction!) See below, or any
number of other references.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A9
66958260

Ever been to Harvard? Ever been to college?

__
Diana
Back to top
Northern Raider
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com...
Quote:
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.


Jeeze Obamas team gets it slightly wrong, but what has mcain got to offer,
his only noticable fact was he is a failed pilot who was so useless he got
shot down by a bunch of peasants, hes a loser like most yanks.
Back to top
Northern Raider
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

"Diana" <imdianawithoutspam@bellsouth.not> wrote in message
news:imdianawithoutspam-2BA8A7.10454401112008@bignews.bellsouth.net...
Quote:
In article <3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.

Posted to a cat group? Well, you're certainly being catty.

Ever heard that the Harvard Law Review is headed up by the President of
the Law Review? This was Obama's role (as if being on the Board of
Editors would not be a sufficient distinction!) See below, or any
number of other references.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A9
66958260

Ever been to Harvard? Ever been to college?

__
Diana

education is not something that features very highly among Americans, put
the combined IQ's of the republicans alonside the IQ's of the NRA and it
still numbers less than 25.
Back to top
Guest







PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:07 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:20:03 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

Quote:
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.

As you've already been corrected, Obama was, in fact, president of the
law review. But if you had a clue about anything you would be a
liberal.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/01/28/at_harvard_law_a_unifying_voice/

Hal
Back to top
The Bob
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

Northern Raider <survivor@northland.com> wrote:
Quote:
education is not something that features very highly among Americans, put
the combined IQ's of the republicans alonside the IQ's of the NRA and it
still numbers less than 25.

"never use ordnance that his higher in caliber than your I. Q."
Back to top
Upscale
Guest






PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

"Northern Raider" <survivor@northland.com> wrote in message
Quote:
Jeeze Obamas team gets it slightly wrong, but what has mcain got to offer,
his only noticable fact was he is a failed pilot who was so useless he got
shot down by a bunch of peasants, hes a loser like most yanks.

Actually, the only loser here is you for posting to this newsgroup.
Back to top
Billsey
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:14 am    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

Northern Raider wrote:

Quote:
Jeeze Obamas team gets it slightly wrong, but what has mcain got to offer,
his only noticable fact was he is a failed pilot who was so useless he got
shot down by a bunch of peasants, hes a loser like most yanks.

McCain was NOT shot down by peasants; he was captured by peasants after
ordinance shot him down. But, then, why should anyone expect a liberal to
get history accurate?
_______________________________________________________________________________
http://www.lulu.com/billsey
Back to top
Ozark Baby
Guest






PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:45:44 -0400, Diana
<imdianawithoutspam@bellsouth.not> wrote:

Quote:
In article <3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:

There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.

The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.

Posted to a cat group? Well, you're certainly being catty.

Ever heard that the Harvard Law Review is headed up by the President of
the Law Review? This was Obama's role (as if being on the Board of
Editors would not be a sufficient distinction!) See below, or any
number of other references.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A9
66958260

Ever been to Harvard? Ever been to college?

__
Diana

You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.

Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.
Back to top
Governor Swill
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 3:44 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:

Quote:
You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.

Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.

It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.

Swill
--
Liberal: I like the puppet on the left.
Conservative: I like the puppet on the right.
Independent: Hey! There's one guy holding both puppets!
Centrist: I hope he knows which puppet's on which hand.
Picture of the Day http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/
Back to top
Billsey
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

Governor Swill wrote:

Quote:
Obama is a critical thinker.

Mwahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!

He trots out the same old, tired, dog-eared, liberal, leftwingnut line that
been thrown in the ring for the last 50 years, but he's a critical thinker!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!
_______________________________________________________________________________
http://www.lulu.com/billsey
Back to top
Ozark Baby
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:38 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:44:06 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:

You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.

Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.

It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.

Swill

Obama is not a critical thinker at all. Obama is a charletan and
nothing more. You have been fooled, as has so many in this country.
God Bless this country, especially if Obama is allowed to be in the
Whitehouse.
Back to top
Ozark Baby
Guest






PostPosted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:40 pm    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:44:06 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

Quote:
Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:

You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.

Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.

It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.

Swill

BTW, if you are considering your vote based on drinks then you are
exactly who should not be voting. I wouldn't want to have a drink with
either of them, since they both have shown to not really care what the
regular citizen says anyway. I would rather someone be in the
Whitehouse who actually had some common sense, something Obama has
none of and McCain has very little of.
Back to top
Average Joe
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:55 am    Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he Reply with quote

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mshtg4hoq4uoq3v52bqg8p16hbrgp28j8h@4ax.com...
Quote:
Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:

You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.

Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.

It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.

Swill
--
And I'm sure you'd be happy to have a drink with Obama in ALL 57 STATES!
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
   MintDepot.com - the Best of UseNet Hobby Postings! Forum Index -> Pets - Cats Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next  
Page 1 of 3
All times are GMT

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum