| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nomen Nescio Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 10:20 pm Post subject: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he was |
|
|
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Globalist Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 11:08 am Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
On Oct 30, 4:20 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
| Quote: | There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
|
Oh this changes everything. Thanks for letting us know about "this
lie"....Of course Bush's lie, supported by McCain, murdered several
thousand innocent people, plus 4,000+ GIs, who died for that same
lie. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Diana Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:45 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
In article <3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
| Quote: | There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
|
Posted to a cat group? Well, you're certainly being catty.
Ever heard that the Harvard Law Review is headed up by the President of
the Law Review? This was Obama's role (as if being on the Board of
Editors would not be a sufficient distinction!) See below, or any
number of other references.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A9
66958260
Ever been to Harvard? Ever been to college?
__
Diana |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Northern Raider Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com...
| Quote: | There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
|
Jeeze Obamas team gets it slightly wrong, but what has mcain got to offer,
his only noticable fact was he is a failed pilot who was so useless he got
shot down by a bunch of peasants, hes a loser like most yanks. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Northern Raider Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:33 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
"Diana" <imdianawithoutspam@bellsouth.not> wrote in message
news:imdianawithoutspam-2BA8A7.10454401112008@bignews.bellsouth.net...
| Quote: | In article <3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
Posted to a cat group? Well, you're certainly being catty.
Ever heard that the Harvard Law Review is headed up by the President of
the Law Review? This was Obama's role (as if being on the Board of
Editors would not be a sufficient distinction!) See below, or any
number of other references.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A9
66958260
Ever been to Harvard? Ever been to college?
__
Diana
|
education is not something that features very highly among Americans, put
the combined IQ's of the republicans alonside the IQ's of the NRA and it
still numbers less than 25. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:07 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:20:03 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
| Quote: | There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
|
As you've already been corrected, Obama was, in fact, president of the
law review. But if you had a clue about anything you would be a
liberal.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/01/28/at_harvard_law_a_unifying_voice/
Hal |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
The Bob Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:10 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
Northern Raider <survivor@northland.com> wrote:
| Quote: | education is not something that features very highly among Americans, put
the combined IQ's of the republicans alonside the IQ's of the NRA and it
still numbers less than 25.
"never use ordnance that his higher in caliber than your I. Q." |
|
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Upscale Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
"Northern Raider" <survivor@northland.com> wrote in message
| Quote: | Jeeze Obamas team gets it slightly wrong, but what has mcain got to offer,
his only noticable fact was he is a failed pilot who was so useless he got
shot down by a bunch of peasants, hes a loser like most yanks.
|
Actually, the only loser here is you for posting to this newsgroup. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Billsey Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:14 am Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
Northern Raider wrote:
| Quote: | Jeeze Obamas team gets it slightly wrong, but what has mcain got to offer,
his only noticable fact was he is a failed pilot who was so useless he got
shot down by a bunch of peasants, hes a loser like most yanks.
|
McCain was NOT shot down by peasants; he was captured by peasants after
ordinance shot him down. But, then, why should anyone expect a liberal to
get history accurate?
_______________________________________________________________________________
http://www.lulu.com/billsey |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Ozark Baby Guest
|
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 10:45:44 -0400, Diana
<imdianawithoutspam@bellsouth.not> wrote:
| Quote: | In article <3a7bba8c9aa1c4ac9974ce7b28789f2f@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
There is a "Board of Editors", over 80 of them in any given year.
The Obamists get caught stretching the truth again.
Posted to a cat group? Well, you're certainly being catty.
Ever heard that the Harvard Law Review is headed up by the President of
the Law Review? This was Obama's role (as if being on the Board of
Editors would not be a sufficient distinction!) See below, or any
number of other references.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE2DC1631F935A35751C0A9
66958260
Ever been to Harvard? Ever been to college?
__
Diana
|
You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.
Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Governor Swill Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:
| Quote: | You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.
Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.
|
It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.
Swill
--
Liberal: I like the puppet on the left.
Conservative: I like the puppet on the right.
Independent: Hey! There's one guy holding both puppets!
Centrist: I hope he knows which puppet's on which hand.
Picture of the Day http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Billsey Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:02 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
Governor Swill wrote:
| Quote: | Obama is a critical thinker.
|
Mwahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!
He trots out the same old, tired, dog-eared, liberal, leftwingnut line that
been thrown in the ring for the last 50 years, but he's a critical thinker!
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!
_______________________________________________________________________________
http://www.lulu.com/billsey |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Ozark Baby Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:44:06 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:
You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.
Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.
It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.
Swill
|
Obama is not a critical thinker at all. Obama is a charletan and
nothing more. You have been fooled, as has so many in this country.
God Bless this country, especially if Obama is allowed to be in the
Whitehouse. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Ozark Baby Guest
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 9:40 pm Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
On Mon, 03 Nov 2008 04:44:06 -0500, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:
You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.
Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.
It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.
Swill
|
BTW, if you are considering your vote based on drinks then you are
exactly who should not be voting. I wouldn't want to have a drink with
either of them, since they both have shown to not really care what the
regular citizen says anyway. I would rather someone be in the
Whitehouse who actually had some common sense, something Obama has
none of and McCain has very little of. |
|
| |
|
Back to top |
Average Joe Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 7:55 am Post subject: Re: Obama was NOT "The Editor" of the Harvard Law Review, he |
|
|
"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:mshtg4hoq4uoq3v52bqg8p16hbrgp28j8h@4ax.com...
| Quote: | Ozark Baby <ozarkbaby@xxxx.com> wrote:
You haven't and that is for sure. He didn't even write one article for
the Harvard Law review. He might have been the editor but he never did
any writing for it.
Just because someone has been to Harrrrvard doesn't mean they got any
better any education someone else did from another college. That is an
old gimmick. In fact, colleges like Harvard and Princetion and Yale
have way too many people that happen to get in because of their
parents or family members that were there, like Bush. You saw what you
got with Bush didn't you? He graduated from Yale and Harvard. He by
himself proves my point completely.
It's not a question of education. It's a question of critical
thinking. Obama is a critical thinker. McCain is not. I'd rather
have a beer with John but a brandy with Obama. We need somebody in
the White House who knows what to use their head for besides as a hat
rack.
Swill
--
And I'm sure you'd be happy to have a drink with Obama in ALL 57 STATES! |
|
|
| |
|
Back to top |
|